Download Punishment: The Supposed Justifications Revisited by Ted Honderich PDF

By Ted Honderich

-- A vintage e-book reworked by means of a thinker at his most powerful --Reviews of the 1st edition:'Painstaking, complete and unimpassioned.' Anthony Kenny, New Statesman'Bold, tricky, direct variety ... a excitement to read.' Mary Warnock, occasions Literary

Show description

Read or Download Punishment: The Supposed Justifications Revisited PDF

Best ethics & morality books

Danger in the Field: Ethics and Risk in Social Research

The character of qualitative inquiry signifies that researchers consistently need to take care of the unforeseen, and all too frequently this implies dealing with the presence of possibility or possibility. This leading edge and full of life research of probability in a variety of qualitative examine settings is drawn from researchers' reflexive debts in their personal encounters with 'danger'.

Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy

This significant dialogue takes a glance at one of the most vital moral matters confronting us this present day by way of a number of the world’s major thinkers. together with essays from prime thinkers, equivalent to Jurgen Habermas, Alasdair MacIntyre, Julia Kristeva and Paul Ricoeur, the book’s spotlight – an interview with Jacques Derrida - provides the main available perception into his considering on ethics and politics for a few years.

Dante's Deadly Sins: Moral Philosophy in Hell

Dante’s lethal Sins is a distinct examine of the ethical philosophy in the back of Dante’s grasp paintings that considers the Commedia as he meant, specifically, as a realistic advisor to ethical betterment. targeting Inferno and Purgatorio, Belliotti examines the puzzles and paradoxes of Dante’s ethical assumptions, his therapy of the 7 lethal sins, and the way 10 of his strongest ethical classes count on glossy existentialism.

Thomas Jefferson : uncovering his unique philosophy and vision

This is often the 1st publication to systematize the philosophical content material of Thomas Jefferson’s writings. Sifting via Jefferson’s many addresses, messages, and letters, thinker M. Andrew Holowchak uncovers an intensely curious Enlightenment philosopher with a well-constructed, people-sympathetic, and constant philosophy.

Extra resources for Punishment: The Supposed Justifications Revisited

Sample text

That is our main question. There are a lot of answers that have been given or implied. We need to go through enough of them – look at some quickly, consider or study others. 7 Do you still half-feel, by the way, that in effect we have already passed by or maybe unreasonably discarded one understanding of saying that a man deserves a punishment, that what it comes to is the following simplicity? (1) He broke the law. Well, you can certainly say that in explanation of the desert claim, if misleadingly.

If there are units for counting culpability and units for counting distress, both of which ideas at least face great difficulties, these certainly are not the same units. There simply are no common units of measurement. Distress–culpability retributivism so regarded is nonsense, anyway just loose talk. Do you say that to object in this way to a common proposition about crime and punishment, a proposition uttered or implied more or less daily by judges, is to be too literal-minded? Do you say that it is not really a claim of fact that is intended by the judges?

Do judges think their propositions of equivalence state some facts or others? You also need to keep in mind that if the reason of equivalence is demoted from a factual judgement into being a moral judgement itself, then we are at least in danger of pointlessness, of circularity. We are indeed in danger of asserting no more than that punishment is right because it is right. What needs to be added to those two thoughts, however, is that judges and others in talking of equivalence or the like may have in mind some other proposition to which we are coming.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.75 of 5 – based on 50 votes